We Should All Be (Inclusive) Feminists

Note to the reader: if you’re unsure of what some of the terms in this post mean, check out ShoutOut’s definition page!

Feminism is my buzzword. Say the “f” word once and I’m as alert as the dog from “Up,” and plaster it on anything I will scoop it up faster than ice cream. So it’s no wonder I showed no hesitation to pick up Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s “We Should All Be Feminists,” adapted from her 2012 Tedx talk of the same name. What I found was a book on Feminist 101. 

Image Source: Aitor Garcia, Flickr

Adichie covers the main topics: the negative stereotypes that surround the word “feminist” and the gender roles and expectations that are associated with men and women. She uses personal stories from her experiences growing up in Nigeria, and although the book is centered around the issues with feminism in Nigeria, the content is widely relatable.

While I agree wholeheartedly with Adichie’s comments about the narrow definition of masculinity that society holds and how we need to raise both our daughters and our sons differently in order to get rid of these gender roles, the author’s thoughts are nothing out of the ordinary. As someone who likes to consider herself pretty well-versed on the basics of feminism, Adichie’s thoughts are all ones I’ve heard before. But for someone who is new to the concept of feminism, she sums everything up in a simple, concise and accessible manner.

What threw me off when reading Adichie’s book was her consistent use of heteronormative and cisgender language. She spoke of everything as men vs. women and relationships between men and women only, and didn’t take into account other genders. This rubbed me the wrong way, especially with Adichie’s recent comments about transgender women in the back of my mind.

In a recent interview with the U.K.’s Channel 4, Adichie said, “When people talk about, ‘Are trans women women?’ my feeling is trans women are trans women.” She went on to say, “I think if you’ve lived in the world as a man with the privileges that the world accords to men and then sort of change gender, it’s difficult for me to accept that then we can equate your experience with the experience of a woman who has lived from the beginning as a woman and who has not been accorded those privileges that men are.”

The comments Adichie made are troubling because she is completely devaluing the experiences of transgender women. While maybe they were afforded some privileges before their transition, that doesn’t mean they didn’t endure struggles at all. I can only imagine how someone feels when they don’t identify with their gender given at birth and how they have to live with that feeling, especially if they are not able to afford gender reassignment surgery.

After hearing these comments and reading this book, I don’t feel that I can consider Adichie a true feminist. My definition of feminism is all inclusive of any race, religion, ethnicity, age, body type, and of course gender. My feminism is about equality of everyone, not putting your experiences above someone else’s and in turn invalidating others. While Adichie recognizes that feminism is about equality and it is everyone’s responsibility, not just one gender, to change societal norms, her personal definition of feminism needs some work if she truly believes that we should all be feminists.

With these recent comments of Adichie in mind, I can’t help but wonder: what would Beyoncé think?

Featured Image Source: Howard County Library System, Flickr

2 thoughts on “We Should All Be (Inclusive) Feminists

  1. WWBT? Glad you brought up her audio-appearance in Bey’s video….it was, in my mind, what made feminism cool. But you are correct, unfortunately Adichie made herself effectively “uncool” by phasing out the very people feminism works to include. I know her initial responses to criticism were that she stood by her comments on trans women, but I wonder 1. she will ever retract or if her comments or 2. if that interview somewhat eliminated her as a credible source on 21st century feminist discourse.


  2. The fact that Adichie has been confirmed to have stated transphobic comments fits perfectly into their cisgender heteronormative language. It’s definitely important to consider background when critiqueing the critiquer. While Adichie has made some troubling comments, it hasn’t invalidated her critique of the ‘single story’ that she seems to be adamantly going against; which I appreciate. It goes along with intersectional feminism as well, and I think that’s what she’s really getting at here. I think that in taking the context and the individual, we’ve painted their story as well. Well written post, really. The last part about “your” feminism is important because not only does it explain what feminism should be, it shows how subjective it is and how personal and powerful it is. Thank you for this, SazzyYazzy.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s