Your Source for Feminist Discourse

“Platonic Friendships” and Sexism

3490222886_48a2fe00e8_z

(featured image flickr-bp6316)

In his special Bring the Pain, comedian Chris Rock stated that “men don’t have platonic friends. We just have women we haven’t fucked yet.” What may seem like a societal exaggeration belies a theory about the relationships between the sexes; heterosexual men may not like women much beyond romance and sex. According to a poll from the University of Alabama both sexes believed it was possible for the two to engage in platonic relationships. However, it was also found that most of those polled believed said platonic relationships involved at least one source of romantic interest, with the ones usually initiating sex being the men.

Psychologist David M. Buss further suggests that in a platonic relationship between a man and a woman, the man is usually the one more likely to initiate romantic/sexual intimacy. Though should said attraction not be reciprocated Buss states that “it is more likely to result in the break-up of the friendship.” This indicates that the average heterosexual man has difficulty disassociating women from sexual attraction, both a consequence of a culture obsessed with oiling up men as hyper-masculinized social climbers and compulsively linking women with male-gaze based sexuality through media.

On the former, Buss states that men have a tendency to see their platonic female friends as either potential sex partners, “useful contacts for expanding one’s coalition” or means for ascending social hierarchies. These findings indicate that most heterosexual men view their relationships with women purely as a means to build themselves up, reducing women to bits of code in programming designed for sexual relationships, hierarchical prestige, and self-esteem boosting. This correlates with traditionally hyper-masculinized narratives of men using everything around them as a means to an end, whereby if a connection does not result in some kind of individual gain, discarded it like fishbone.

Another factor to heterosexual male difficulty of having platonic friends is through mainstream culture’s incessant hypersexualizing of women for a male gaze, further strengthening the narrative that women and sexuality hold an omnipresent link. Social psychologists Sarah Murnen found that half of 1,988 advertisements from 50 prominent American magazines featured women being portrayed as sex objects based on the posture, facial expression, make-up activity, camera angle and level of skin shown. Erin Hatton, co-author of a sociological study at the University of Buffalo stated “it’s the intensity and extent of being sexualized-not just one or two elements-that we are seeing increase in the portrayals of women” using the example that 83 percent of women on the cover of Rolling Stones in the 2000s were sexualized, compared to only 14 percent of men.

The pervasiveness through which women are filtered through a hypersexualized male gaze perpetuates the male tendency to de-humanize women beyond personal gain, as they are conditioned to believe they only exist for male satisfaction. This diminishes the opportunity for men to form meaningful connections with women beyond the potential for romance, isolating the two sexes from each other and leading to a further perpetuation of societal sexism and gendered inhibition.

3 Responses to ““Platonic Friendships” and Sexism”

  1. BreakingLinea

    I believe that the biggest issue is that people refuse to accept that the “male gaze” exists, and even though it does, they shrug and say that’s “just how men are.” It’s all a bunch of excuses when in reality it is how our institutions socialize us, from infants into adulthood, that males cannot be helped with their sexual urges… instead of focusing on the institutions which foster this hyper-masculine and hyper-sexualized reality.

    What steps can we make to help diminish this? How can we bring change so that the institutions don’t reinforce misogyny and hyper-masculinity?

    Reply
  2. LEMONADEmouth

    BeakngLinea, I completely agree with your comment, as you make much of the same argument I was going to make. Not only do people namely men, deny the “male gaze” exists, yes, giving the excuse, “OH he’s just being a guy” but shame women right in the same breath.

    Thebearknightreturns, I appreciate that you mention the fact that women are dehumanized by men. That is so true!! It is incredible, and extremely sad, the amount of influence the media has on the way women are perceived overall. The fact that the idea of the “male gaze” contributes to the dehumanization of women explains why women say, among other things, they hate men. Moreover, I find it to be infuriating how there is such denial behind the male gaze. It’s incredible interesting how if we were to see or consider the opposite, the “female gaze”, how drastically different the perspective would be. We wonder why things or even women have become more sexualized all we have to do is look at the media. The 84:14 statistic proves my point. Ridiculous!

    It’s a vicious cycle. Men see women in terms of sex; women allow themselves to become sexualized because they want a man and they think that’s what men want. Women are condemned for acting/behaving/looking/feeling sexual. Which makes men’s relationships about a sexual conquest rather than a relationship. In tern leaving women thoroughly confused and at fault.

    Reply
  3. Valeria

    This website is really cool. I have bookmarked it.
    Do you allow guest post on your site ? I can write high quality posts for you.
    Let me know.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Basic HTML is allowed. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

%d bloggers like this: