Surrogacy; crime against humanity?

Mary Pilcher-Cook; feminist extraordinaire! Except, is she? For starters, this Kansas Republican, responsible for the proposed bill SB 302, aims to impose a law that would fine ANYONE involved in surrogacy in the state of Kansas up to $10,000 and one year of imprisonment. That includes hospitals, agencies, surrogates and the surrogate parents. Reasons? Well the explanations seem viable, but inherently flawed. In a case of what seems like mortification, Pilcher-Cook decided to heroically take on the weight of all women and their reproductive organs, because she doesn’t want them to be commoditized and potentially exploited. As such, Pilcher-Cook claims that having the money to afford surrogacy or other means of IVF create and sustain the hegemonic socio-economic privilege system.

While this seems solid- it defeats the right of freedoms through ‘protection’. Pilcher-Cook’s argument vies that surrogacy is “creating a child that you know is purposely not going to have either a biological mother, biological father or both.” Purposely? So it’s a scam? Must be. It pushes my buttons even further how she makes up the mind of women for them, women who genuinely cannot have children or who want another option. Who NEED another option. And not only does she insult families who seek surrogacy, but she consistently overuses harsh rhetoric describing gestational carriers as “sitting ducks for exploitation and fraud.” Damn. That’s cold…

While I may seem overly condescending, I know that these basic freedoms that we live with perpetuate the shitty patriarchal system we live in- but through making rules for the sake of making rules, where are we heading? I don’t believe ANY law should exist that limits what someone can do to or with their bodies. If I was born with it, I want to be the one to make every. single. decision. About what I do with it. And that goes for the girl sitting across from me in the library. My mom. My professors. Everyone. While I don’t believe my opinion is necessarily the right one, I this issue needs discussion from people who’ve been directly effected. Not some fairy god mother republican looking to end anti-choice at its alternative levels.

When it comes down to it, my main confusion stems from Pilcher-Cook stating herself as a member of the Kansas National Organization of Women and a long-standing feminist. What do you think? Is this protecting women or harming them by imposing more rules on their bodies? Does she have the best intention for women? For families?

One thought on “Surrogacy; crime against humanity?

  1. This makes my blood boil. Hopefully this law will not get passed, because I feel it would be unconstitutional. If a woman wishes to bare someone else’s child and wants to make a profit off of if that is her right. But above all as you state some women no matter how hard they try cannot carry a baby, and if someone else can carry their child then that is awesome! I also think that Mary Pilcher-Cook is ignorant in thinking that all children of surrogates will not have biological parents. They may have only one biological parent but who cares the surrogate doesn’t keep the baby and gives the baby to their family who will hopefully give them a wonderful and loving life. Thank you for sharing this post and let us hope that this bill never comes to fruition.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s